New research provides evidence that sexually motivated serial killers are often driven by a complex combination of grandiose entitlement and deep-seated emotional vulnerability. A study analyzing the confessions and interviews of 45 serial offenders suggests that while many of these individuals display arrogance and a need for admiration, they are frequently characterized by intense feelings of resentment and hypersensitivity. The findings were published in the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.
Serial killers have historically been categorized based on their apparent motives. Criminologists often classify them into distinct types, such as those driven by a desire for power, sexual gratification, or mission-oriented delusions. While these categories help law enforcement understand the crime scene, they can oversimplify the psychological makeup of the offender.
Recent shifts in psychological research favor looking at personality traits on a spectrum rather than placing individuals into rigid boxes. Narcissism is one of the most prominent traits associated with serial homicide, yet it is often misunderstood as purely a manifestation of an inflated ego.
Prior research has largely focused on the grandiose aspects of narcissism in these offenders. This includes traits like dominance, aggression, and an exaggerated sense of self-importance. Less attention has been paid to vulnerable narcissism, which involves insecurity, social withdrawal, and defensive hostility.
Most existing knowledge comes from individual case studies, which provide deep detail but lack the ability to generalize to the broader population of offenders. The authors of the new study sought to address this gap by systematically analyzing a larger group of sexually motivated serial killers to determine how different dimensions of narcissism manifest and interact.
“I was always interested in studying criminal psychology and in particular the minds of serial killers because I felt the need to understand their thought pattern. And after doing an interpretative phenomenological analysis study on five serial killers for my MSc thesis, I felt I really needed to go down that path further,” said study author Evangelia Ioannidi, a researcher at the University of Bamberg.
“So when I discussed this idea with my current PhD supervisor Professor Dr. Astrid Schütz, we discussed how often serial killers are described as ‘narcissistic,’ but usually in a very vague way and almost always focused on the grandiose, showy side. At the same time, newer research on narcissism clearly distinguishes between grandiose and vulnerable forms, and I felt this distinction was missing in the serial killer literature.”
“I wanted to know whether sexually motivated serial killers really are just ‘inflated egos,’ or whether there is also a more fragile, hypersensitive, and hostile inner world behind their crimes. This study grew out of that gap: bringing modern narcissism theory into a very extreme but heavily discussed offender group.”
To conduct the study, the researchers utilized the Radford FGCU serial killer database. They identified a pool of male sexually motivated serial killers who were active in the United States between 1960 and 2021. From this group, they were able to obtain complete and accessible files for 45 offenders. The data consisted of police confessions, interrogation transcripts, and interviews conducted by the FBI. These documents were acquired through Freedom of Information Act requests to various state police departments and federal agencies.
The research team employed a method known as qualitative content analysis to examine the offenders’ statements. They used a specific coding scheme based on two psychological models: the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept and the Vulnerable Isolation and Enmity Concept.
These frameworks break narcissism down into four distinct dimensions. Grandiose admiration involves self-promotion and a striving for uniqueness. Grandiose rivalry is characterized by the devaluation of others and striving for supremacy. Vulnerable isolation involves withdrawing from social contact to protect a fragile self-esteem. Vulnerable enmity is marked by varying degrees of paranoia, aggression, and a belief that one is being treated unfairly.
Two independent analysts reviewed the transcripts to identify phrases and sentiments that corresponded to these four dimensions. They assessed whether each trait was present or absent in the statements of each offender. The analysis focused specifically on sections where the killers discussed their childhoods, upbringing, and the motivations behind their first two murders.
The analysis revealed that traits of vulnerable narcissism were slightly more prevalent than grandiose traits in this sample. Indications of vulnerable narcissism appeared in 89 percent of the statements, while grandiose narcissism was found in 87 percent. When the researchers broke these down into specific dimensions, they found that vulnerable enmity was the most common trait, appearing in 84 percent of the cases.
“I expected grandiose traits to dominate, because that’s how serial killers are usually portrayed,” Ioannidi told PsyPost. “Instead, the most prevalent dimension was vulnerable enmity: deep hostility, hypersensitivity, and fixation on perceived rejection or disrespect. Seeing that this internal fragility showed up even more consistently than the ‘inflated ego’ side was striking, and it reshaped how I understand the psychology driving sexually motivated serial homicide.”
Grandiose admiration was the second most common trait, identified in 76 percent of the statements. This indicates that alongside their hostility, many of these individuals possess a strong desire to be admired and recognized as special. Grandiose rivalry was present in 71 percent of the cases, showing a tendency to view social interactions as competitions that must be won. Vulnerable isolation was the least common of the four, though it was still observed in 58 percent of the sample.
A key finding of the study was the significant overlap between these traits. The researchers observed that these dimensions rarely existed in isolation. For example, there was a strong association between grandiose rivalry and vulnerable enmity. Offenders who displayed a competitive drive to dominate others were also highly likely to express feelings of being wronged or persecuted.
The data showed that 62 percent of the sample exhibited both of these traits simultaneously. This combination paints a picture of offenders who are not only aggressive in their pursuit of superiority but are also reactively hostile due to a fragile sense of self.
The study also found that grandiose admiration and grandiose rivalry frequently co-occurred. Approximately 60 percent of the offenders displayed both traits. This suggests a dynamic where the individual alternates between seeking validation through self-promotion and asserting dominance through the devaluation of others. The authors suggest that this interplay serves to maintain the offender’s inflated self-image. When the strategy of seeking admiration fails, the offender may switch to rivalry and aggression to protect their ego.
The results provide evidence that the psychological profile of sexually motivated serial killers is multifaceted. It challenges the popular media portrayal of these offenders as purely cold and calculating figures driven solely by a god complex.
“These offenders aren’t driven only by ego or the desire to feel powerful,” Ioannidi explained. “Yes, many show grandiose traits, but an equally important part is the vulnerable side — the resentment, hypersensitivity, and deep sense of being wronged. Those two sides working together help explain why their violence is so personal and fueled by control. It’s not about excusing them; it’s about understanding that the psychology behind these crimes is more complex than people usually assume.”
The authors note that these findings have potential implications for criminal profiling. Recognizing that a suspect may be driven by a mix of grandiosity and hypersensitivity could help investigators in interview strategies. For instance, an offender who displays high levels of vulnerable enmity might react poorly to direct confrontation but could be more responsive to an approach that acknowledges their perceived grievances.
However, the researchers caution that these traits are not unique to criminals. Many people in the general population possess narcissistic traits without ever engaging in violent behavior.
“The biggest caveat is that narcissistic traits alone do not make someone dangerous,” Ioannidi noted. “These traits exist everywhere in normal life, and most people who show them are not violent. My study looks at how narcissism appears within an already extreme group of offenders — not how to identify future criminals. It’s important that readers don’t confuse psychological traits with destiny or prediction.”
The study, like all research, includes some limitions. The sample size of 45, while larger than typical case studies, is still relatively small. This limits the statistical power of the analysis. The reliance on archival police records means that the data is secondary and lacks the depth of a clinical psychological evaluation.
The study also focused exclusively on male offenders in the United States, so the findings may not apply to female serial killers or those from different cultural backgrounds. Additionally, the researchers did not have detailed information on the victims, which prevented them from analyzing how victim characteristics might influence the expression of narcissistic traits.
Future research is needed to validate these findings with larger and more diverse samples. The authors recommend investigating how these narcissistic dimensions interact with other personality traits. Understanding the developmental pathways that lead to this specific combination of grandiosity and vulnerability could also aid in the creation of early intervention strategies.
“I want to expand the work by examining how narcissistic traits interact with other dimensions like psychopathy, sadism, and early trauma,” Ioannidi said. “Another goal is to look more closely at developmental patterns: how vulnerable and grandiose traits shift over time and how they shape behavior. I’m also interested in creating more refined, evidence-based profiling tools that help investigators without falling into stereotypes or overgeneralizations.”
“One thing I want to emphasize is that this study bridges two fields that rarely talk to each other: modern personality science and forensic investigation. By using updated theoretical models rather than outdated labels, we can describe these offenders more accurately and responsibly. My hope is that this approach moves the conversation beyond sensationalism and toward a clearer understanding of what actually drives such crimes.”
The study, “Narcissistic Traits in Sexually Motivated Serial Killers,” was authored by Evangelia Ioannidi, Iris K. Gauglitz, Nicole Sherretts, and Astrid Schuetz.